<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Fri, 24 Feb 2012 04:38:04 GMT--><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/universal/styles/feed.css"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Setting the Record Straight - Comments</title><link>http://www.settingtherecordstraight.ca/journal/</link><description></description><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Alarm Monitoring Houston comments on New Numbers Backing Positive Economic Impacts</title><author>Alarm Monitoring Houston</author><pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 08:49:35 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.settingtherecordstraight.ca/journal/2011/5/24/new-numbers-backing-positive-economic-impacts.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">341586:3613241:comment/16149314</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Your website have very interesting article. I got knowledge from here. Besides that, your blog is so popular among the searchers from search engines. It means yours website is very good<a href="http://www.smithmonitoring.com/houston-security/" rel="nofollow">Alarm Monitoring Houston</a>  [url=http://www.smithmonitoring.com/houston-security/]Alarm Monitoring Houston[/url]</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Don Thompson comments on Egyptian Unrest Highlights the Oil Sands’ Importance</title><author>Don Thompson</author><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:48:44 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.settingtherecordstraight.ca/journal/2011/2/7/egyptian-unrest-highlights-the-oil-sands-importance.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">341586:3613241:comment/13469997</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much Obrain. I appreciate your comment! Keep the comments coming!   Don</p>]]></description></item><item><title>obrain comments on Egyptian Unrest Highlights the Oil Sands’ Importance</title><author>obrain</author><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:52:46 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.settingtherecordstraight.ca/journal/2011/2/7/egyptian-unrest-highlights-the-oil-sands-importance.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">341586:3613241:comment/13385433</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>hi this is a nice blog where i read a lot of information about oil sands</p>]]></description></item><item><title>James comments on The evolution of oil sands monitoring</title><author>James</author><pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:27:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.settingtherecordstraight.ca/journal/2010/12/21/the-evolution-of-oil-sands-monitoring.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">341586:3613241:comment/12135919</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>before using oil sand ,is there a greener way??</p>]]></description></item><item><title>David comments on Oil and transparency do mix</title><author>David</author><pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:58:57 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.settingtherecordstraight.ca/journal/2010/8/18/oil-and-transparency-do-mix.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">341586:3613241:comment/9797208</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama said, &quot;Oil is a finite resource... We consume more than 20 percent of the world’s oil, but have less than 2 percent of the world’s oil reserves.&quot;</p><p>The United States alone consumes more than 20 million barrels a day — more than China, Japan, Russia, Germany, and India combined.</p><p>Yes, the USA sucks in 20 millon barrels a day of oil, or over 7 billion barrels a year. The world uses 28 billions a year, give or take a billion. </p><p>America&#39; Appetite for Oil<br/>The United States consumes 20 million barrels daily.  That&#39;s more than the next-five-largest consumers - China, Japan, Russia, Germany, and India - combined. Of those 20 million barrels, 56% are imported. The imports alone represent more oil than Saudi Arabia produces in a day; in fact, it accounts for nearly 20% of the world&#39;s entire production.</p><p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_gas_emissions_by_the_United_States<br/>Greenhouse gas emissions by the United States<br/>Until 2006, the United States was the largest emitter of carbon dioxide emissions. China has been the top emitter since 2006. </p><p><br/>The US anti-oilsands protestors and companies better take the log out of their own eye first becuase it is a big hypocritical double standard when they criticize the oilsands in Alberta when the USA has many times more, carbon foot print than all of Canada combined many, many times over polluting the world.</p><p>Also just for one example the very massive open pit mines in Nevada and Utah with huge tailing piles.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Don Thompson comments on Low-carbon fuel standard</title><author>Don Thompson</author><pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:10:46 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.settingtherecordstraight.ca/journal/2010/1/21/low-carbon-fuel-standard.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">341586:3613241:comment/7721396</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments, Steven. You raise some good points that I try to hammer home every chance I get.</p><p>There are several models which have been used to compare sources of fuel  and which have been  used by some governments to shape their low carbon fuel standards and other legislation. This mix of models has created a fair bit of confusion and, as you point out, has  led people to believe, wrongly in my view, that bio-diesel has less net energy impact than other fuels and is a “greener” alternative to fuels created from oil sands crude. I intend to make this the subject of a blog post very shortly. </p><p>Your point about the simple, and unfortunately misguided, assertion that we, as a society, don’t need energy from fossil fuels because we have wind, solar, etc. is also valid. We are, for the foreseeable future going to be reliant on oil and natural gas and, given the shrinking supplies of conventional oil, increasingly energy from oil is going to be coming from heavy oil, including that produced in the oil sands. </p><p>As to your final question…about OSDG going public with the facts, I can tell you we’re working hard at it. I made almost 100 presentations last year, and OSDG information appeared in more than 300 media articles. I know we’ve got more to do and we’ve already completed or are planning dozens of additional appearances for this year. Stay tuned here for updates.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Steven C Davidson - Pursuit Placement Group comments on Low-carbon fuel standard</title><author>Steven C Davidson - Pursuit Placement Group</author><pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 03:57:30 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.settingtherecordstraight.ca/journal/2010/1/21/low-carbon-fuel-standard.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">341586:3613241:comment/7421188</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>What I don't understand is why there has never been a model publicly developed and championed which computes the net carbon footprint of all fuels. It seems to me that the data is available and yet there are still people that believe bio-diesel has a less net energy impact than other fuels. <br/>The Low-carbon fuel people of the world are not getting the entire message. How did carbon get such a bad rap, because it's easy to see. If there was a technology to camouflage the issue I'll bet it would have almost the same impact as a true reduction of carbon. <br/>I'm not advocating stagnation, on the contrary, we need to move forward, but it is unreasonable for people to continue to spin the message that our oil is not good for their usage, a la Bed Bath and Beyond. <br/>This idea that there is enough other 'alternative' sources of energy, or that there could be in a reasonable amount of time does not hold water. The wind turbine people claim 45% efficiency of their turbines for a potential peak of 4% of the energy usage in Alberta. This assumes that population does not grow, and that wind patterns remain the same. All other forms of energy combined do not equal current levels of energy produced by oil&amp;gas and coal. <br/>As consumer demand increases for plastics, fuel costs will increase as well. We need to hedge our bets and so does the US market. There is just no way they are going to find a better, larger, or more stable source for energy through the next 50 years than the oilsands.<br/>Don, the one question I really want answered is, why the OSDG is not more public with the blunt facts? </p><p>Steven C Davidson - Pursuit Placement Group</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Charles Ruigrok comments on Generosity in the oil sands</title><author>Charles Ruigrok</author><pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 03:45:22 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.settingtherecordstraight.ca/journal/2009/12/18/generosity-in-the-oil-sands.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">341586:3613241:comment/6622240</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I share Mr. Thompson's feelings about the Fort McMurray community.  I was proud to be part of the community for 3 and a half years - in part for the reasons he noted.  Fort McMurray - and it's people - do not get the recognition that they deserve.  The media (outside of the local media) has placed significant emphasis on sensationalizing the shortcomings in the community - many of which are no different than those that you find in any larger Canadian urban area.  What few Canadians appreciate is that the media attention is there because the Wood Buffalo region plays such a significant role in our Canadian economy.  It would be nice to have the media provide a more balanced perspective - and share some of the many positive stories about oilsands development in the Wood Buffalo region - and what this has meant to the people of Fort McMurray - and for that matter the province of Alberta and our country.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>roger comments on Good news stories</title><author>roger</author><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:59:01 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.settingtherecordstraight.ca/journal/2009/4/24/good-news-stories.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">341586:3613241:comment/5317126</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>concentrating on the future and spreading the monies spent around, in viable business opportunities, is an excellent way to encourage self sufficiency and create persons who are not only self supporting but also productive members of society. Much better than a charity or hand out situation. Although it is very likely that Tar Sands Development $$ are ending up in charitable hands as well. <br/>read my review of the terrible printed work __  http://tiny.cc/Ce68i</p>]]></description></item><item><title>not lacking intelligence comments on Clearing the air or clearly erring?</title><author>not lacking intelligence</author><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 00:16:31 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.settingtherecordstraight.ca/journal/2009/6/16/clearing-the-air-or-clearly-erring.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">341586:3613241:comment/4908284</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I hope that this debate has assisted with bridging that gap.</p>]]></description></item></channel></rss>
